CVSS2
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Authentication
NONE
Confidentiality Impact
COMPLETE
Integrity Impact
COMPLETE
Availability Impact
COMPLETE
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
HIGH
Integrity Impact
HIGH
Availability Impact
HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
Percentile
99.4%
The version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack running on the remote host is 6.1.x prior to 6.1.12. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1923)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1329. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1924)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1332. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause an overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1925)
A buffer overflow condition exists in the FXCLI_OraBR_Exec_Command() function due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1929)
A buffer overflow condition exists in the JOB_S_GetJobByUserFriendlyString() function due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1930)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to execute arbitrary commands with a system call. (CVE-2015-1938)
An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the handling of opcode 1329. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to gain access to arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1941)
An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the handling of opcode 1332. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to write or execute arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1942)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1364. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1948)
An unspecified flaw exists that is triggered during the handling of opcode 1330. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via specially crafted packet, to execute arbitrary commands with a system call. (CVE-2015-1949)
A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format string specifiers when processing opcode 1335. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1953)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1954)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1962)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1963)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1964)
An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1965)
A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format string specifiers when processing opcode 1301. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1986)
Multiple stack-based buffer overflow conditions exist due to improper bounds checking. A remote attacker can exploit these, via a crafted packet, to crash the server or execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
(CVE-2016-0212, CVE-2016-0213, CVE-2016-0216)
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#
include("compat.inc");
if (description)
{
script_id(84585);
script_version("1.10");
script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/11/25");
script_cve_id(
"CVE-2015-1923",
"CVE-2015-1924",
"CVE-2015-1925",
"CVE-2015-1929",
"CVE-2015-1930",
"CVE-2015-1938",
"CVE-2015-1941",
"CVE-2015-1942",
"CVE-2015-1948",
"CVE-2015-1949",
"CVE-2015-1953",
"CVE-2015-1954",
"CVE-2015-1962",
"CVE-2015-1963",
"CVE-2015-1964",
"CVE-2015-1965",
"CVE-2015-1986",
"CVE-2016-0212",
"CVE-2016-0213",
"CVE-2016-0216"
);
script_bugtraq_id(
75444,
75445,
75446,
75447,
75448,
75449,
75450,
75451,
75452,
75453,
75454,
75455,
75456,
75457,
75458,
75459,
75461,
83278,
83280,
83281
);
script_name(english:"IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1.x < 6.1.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities");
script_summary(english:"Checks the version of IBM TSM.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote backup service is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack running on the
remote host is 6.1.x prior to 6.1.12. It is, therefore, affected by
multiple vulnerabilities :
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A
remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue
to cause a buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of
service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1923)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1329. A
remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue
to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a
denial of service condition or the execution of
arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1924)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1332. A
remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue
to cause an overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1925)
- A buffer overflow condition exists in the
FXCLI_OraBR_Exec_Command() function due to improper
validation of user-supplied input. A remote,
unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a
specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer
overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the
execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1929)
- A buffer overflow condition exists in the
JOB_S_GetJobByUserFriendlyString() function due to
improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote,
unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a
specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer
overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the
execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1930)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A
remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue,
via a specially crafted packet, to execute arbitrary
commands with a system call. (CVE-2015-1938)
- An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the
handling of opcode 1329. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to gain access to
arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1941)
- An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the
handling of opcode 1332. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to write or execute
arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1942)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1364. A
remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this
issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a
stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of
service condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1948)
- An unspecified flaw exists that is triggered during the
handling of opcode 1330. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue, via specially crafted
packet, to execute arbitrary commands with a system
call. (CVE-2015-1949)
- A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function
due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format
string specifiers when processing opcode 1335. A remote,
unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a
specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1953)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based
buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1954)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based
buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1962)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based
buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1963)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based
buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1964)
- An overflow condition exists due to improper validation
of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated
attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based
buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1965)
- A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function
due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format
string specifiers when processing opcode 1301. A remote,
unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a
specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service
condition or the execution of arbitrary code.
(CVE-2015-1986)
- Multiple stack-based buffer overflow conditions exist
due to improper bounds checking. A remote attacker can
exploit these, via a crafted packet, to crash the server
or execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
(CVE-2016-0212, CVE-2016-0213, CVE-2016-0216)");
# http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21959398
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?bc221f52");
# http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21975358
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?5833512d");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Upgrade to IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.12 or
later.");
script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:F/RL:OF/RC:C");
script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H");
script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:F/RL:O/RC:C");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2016-0216");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_framework_core", value:"true");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2015/05/18");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2015/07/02");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2015/07/07");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"remote");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback");
script_end_attributes();
script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
script_family(english:"General");
script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2015-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
script_dependencies("ibm_tsm_fastback_detect.nbin", "os_fingerprint.nasl");
script_require_keys("IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack Server", "Services/tsm-fastback");
exit(0);
}
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");
include("audit.inc");
port = get_service(svc:"tsm-fastback", default:11460, ipproto:"tcp", exit_on_fail:TRUE);
app_name = "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack Server";
version = get_kb_item_or_exit(app_name + "/" + port + "/version");
if (version == "unknown")
audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_APP_VER, app_name);
# We only care about 6.1 specifically.
if (version !~ "^6\.1(\.|$)")
audit(AUDIT_NOT_LISTEN, app_name +" 6.1", port);
os = get_kb_item("Host/OS");
# Only Windows targets are affected.
if (!isnull(os) && "Windows" >!< os)
audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, 'Windows');
# If we cant determine the OS and we don't have paranoia on we do not continue
# this is probably a version so old it does not matter for these checks anyway
if (isnull(os) && report_paranoia < 2)
audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "determinable.");
# Check for fixed version
fix = "6.1.12";
if (ver_compare(ver:version,fix:fix,strict:FALSE) < 0)
{
report =
'\n Product : ' + app_name +
'\n Port : ' + port +
'\n Installed version : ' + version +
'\n Fixed version : ' + fix +
'\n';
security_report_v4(port:port, extra:report, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);
exit(0);
}
else
audit(AUDIT_LISTEN_NOT_VULN, app_name, port, version);
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1923
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1924
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1925
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1929
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1930
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1938
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1941
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1942
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1948
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1949
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1953
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1954
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1962
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1963
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1964
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1965
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-1986
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-0212
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-0213
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-0216
www.nessus.org/u?5833512d
www.nessus.org/u?bc221f52
CVSS2
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Authentication
NONE
Confidentiality Impact
COMPLETE
Integrity Impact
COMPLETE
Availability Impact
COMPLETE
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Privileges Required
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact
HIGH
Integrity Impact
HIGH
Availability Impact
HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
Percentile
99.4%