Lucene search

K
securityvulnsSecurityvulnsSECURITYVULNS:DOC:2519
HistoryFeb 20, 2002 - 12:00 a.m.

CheckPoint FW1 HTTP Security Hole

2002-02-2000:00:00
vulners.com
9

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings!

A quite known proxy vulnerability was found for FW1 V4.1 SP5 (plus
hotfixes) - thanks to Ryan Snyder for announcing the first bits on
Firewall-1 mailing list.

If you connect to a server you are allowed to connect to via HTTP
proxy (e.g. a common rule is "Any / WebServer / http->ressource").
Then use the CONNECT method to connect to a different server, e.g.
an internal mailserver.

Example:
you = 6.6.6.666
Webserver = 1.1.1.1
Internal Mailserver = 2.2.2.2

    Rule allows:  Any  Webserver http->ressource

    connect with "telnet 1.1.1.1 80" to the webserver and enter
    CONNECT 2.2.2.2:25 / HTTP/1.0

    response: mail server banner - and running SMTP session e.g.
    to send SPAM from.

You can connect to any TCP port on any machine the firewall
can connect to. Telnet, SMTP, POP, etc.

Restrictions found:
- connects are only possible if the firewall module
is allowed access (i.e. via policy/properties,
specific rules or "Any (dst) (svc)…" rules
- you have to allow "CONNECT" - is enabled if you allowed
"Tunneling" (General tab) connection method or did not
delete the "*" in "Other" Methods (Match tab)

Fast workarounds:
- Change your ressource settings to filter out CONNECT
commands, i.e.
* disable HTTP tunneling
* check that "Other" method is specified NOT to
match CONNECT (i.e. remove the default wildcard)
- disallow access from the firewall module (->Properties)
- replace in all your rules containing the service
HTTP+Resource this part with plain HTTP. Yes, you loose

      some content security but at least you don't compromise

      your other servers

The thing that really concerns me is, that this general problem has
been known to be an issue with plain HTTP proxies like the Squid since
ages (see e.g. http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-10.html#ss10.14).
And why didn't Checkpoint prevent or at least document this?

Puzzled
Volker



[email protected] discon GmbH
IT-Security Consulting Wrangelstrasse 100
http://www.discon.de/ 10997 Berlin, Germany


PGP-Fingerprint: 5323 a4f7 a7c2 b8ef 4653 05ce d2ea 2b74 b94c c68e
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - WinPT v0.0.3 (WINNT)
Comment: This is the WinPT config test

iEYEARECAAYFAjxyaZgACgkQ0uordLlMxo6yhQCeIzM/tWK3HCEVM/V816WSFpgh
YhMAoJX/uDKzPE1NKO9XKzizs3sxZWiW
=XumZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----