Lucene search

K
ubuntucveUbuntu.comUB:CVE-2016-7032
HistoryApr 14, 2017 - 12:00 a.m.

CVE-2016-7032

2017-04-1400:00:00
ubuntu.com
ubuntu.com
8

6.9 Medium

CVSS2

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

MEDIUM

Authentication

NONE

Confidentiality Impact

COMPLETE

Integrity Impact

COMPLETE

Availability Impact

COMPLETE

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

7 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

5.1%

sudo_noexec.so in Sudo before 1.8.15 on Linux might allow local users to
bypass intended noexec command restrictions via an application that calls
the (1) system or (2) popen function.

Notes

Author Note
seth-arnold Iโ€™m marking this negligible because this feature seems doomed to failure in the general case. Any sort of memory-protection flaws in the target process, or ability to execute system calls directly, or programs that donโ€™t use the standard C libraries, etc. wonโ€™t be affected by this feature. If you rely upon this feature I suggest instead seccomp2-based filters to disable the execve() and execveat() system calls at the kernel interface or AppArmor (or other MAC system) to restrict which executables can be executed.
OSVersionArchitecturePackageVersionFilename
ubuntu14.04noarchsudo<ย 1.8.9p5-1ubuntu1.5+esm5UNKNOWN

6.9 Medium

CVSS2

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

MEDIUM

Authentication

NONE

Confidentiality Impact

COMPLETE

Integrity Impact

COMPLETE

Availability Impact

COMPLETE

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

7 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

5.1%