Lucene search

K
ubuntucveUbuntu.comUB:CVE-2023-52881
HistoryMay 29, 2024 - 12:00 a.m.

CVE-2023-52881

2024-05-2900:00:00
ubuntu.com
ubuntu.com
3
linux kernel
tcp
validation
patch
cve-2023-52881
security
rfc 5961
spoofed flows
packetdrill
socket option
bind
listen
handshake

7.5 High

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

13.0%

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: do
not accept ACK of bytes we never sent This patch is based on a detailed
report and ideas from Yepeng Pan and Christian Rossow. ACK seq validation
is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines: The ACK value is considered
acceptable only if it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <=
SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn’t satisfy
the above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to be
noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: “If the ACK is a
duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK acknowledges
something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an ACK, drop the
segment, and return”. The “ignored” above implies that the processing of
the incoming data segment continues, which means the ACK value is treated
as acceptable. This mitigation makes the ACK check more stringent since any
ACK < SND.UNA wouldn’t be accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range
((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through. This can be
refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows, by not accepting ACK for
bytes that were never sent. This greatly improves TCP security at a little
cost. I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees,
even if the ‘blamed’ patch was adhering to the RFC. tp->bytes_acked was
added in linux-4.2 Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan)
shows the issue at hand: 0 socket(…, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3 +0
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 +0 bind(3, …, …) =
0 +0 listen(3, 1024) = 0 // ---------------- Handshake -------------------
// // when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to //
65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet // with ack
number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1) // ,though this ack
number acknowledges some data never // sent by the server. +0 < S 0:0(0)
win 65535 <mss 1400,nop,wscale 14> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <…> +0 < . 1:1(0)
ack 1 win 65535 +0 accept(3, …, …) = 4 // For the established
connection, we send an ACK packet, // the ack packet uses ack number 1 -
1073725300 + 2^32, // where 2^32 is used to wrap around. // Note: we used
1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible // edge cases. // 1 -
1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997 // Oops, old kernels happily accept this
packet. +0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535 // After the kernel
fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK, // and prior
malicious frame would be dropped. +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001

7.5 High

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

13.0%